How The Char Dham Project Is Ruining The Alaknanda Valley, And Won't Improve Defence Infrastructure Either
ADIL AKHZER/ An Awaaz South Asia Exclusive | 01/12/2023
Text Size:
The successful rescue after a 17-day effort of all 41
workers trapped in the collapsed tunnel that they were constructing in Silkyara
in Uttarakhand is being celebrated by all Indians. Beyond the celebration, the
incident has prompted question over the environmental challenges that the Char
Dham project is posing to a fragile section of the Himalaya, and the manner in
which the project ducked the requirement for an Environmental Impact
Assessment.
As the rescue operation was underway, Adil Akhzer of
Awaaz South Asia spoke to Shyam Saran, former Foreign Secretary, the Prime
Minister’s Special Envoy on Climate Change and an avid mountaineer, on the
frequent disasters happening in the Himalayan region and what can be done to
prevent the next occurrence.
Excerpts from the interview:
How fragile is the Himalayan region? Why
has the Uttarkashi tunnel collapsed?
The whole Himalayan region is a very fragile
ecological zone. Geologically it is also a very young terrain. It is still in
the midst of being formed. Moreover, it is a shifting terrain. This means that
you have to be extra careful when you undertake any construction project,
because construction disturbs the terrain around it.
Also, if you have projects of the kind that we have
here in Uttarkashi that is a tunnel project, several things are required.
First, very large-scale tunnelling needs very large machines. Second, blasting
the mountainside is necessary, which completely disturbs the terrain over a
large area. So, if you construct a highway or a railway, the danger of
disturbing the terrain and causing landslides or avalanches always exists.
Why are landslides & other
environmental disasters frequently happening in Himalayan region?
One of the problems is debris control. When the
digging of tunnels or dams takes place, a huge amount of earth is removed. The
rules say the contractor must remove the debris from the site, but the fact of
the matter is that most of the debris is just thrown on the hillside and, in
some cases, even thrown into the river. This raises the bottom of the river,
which means that when the river is in spate it causes more frequent flooding.
If you throw the debris on the side, the natural drainage in many of these
areas gets blocked, leading to water-logging in the upper reaches and often a
large-scale shortage of water in the lower reaches. We see this in many places
in the Himalayas.
What precautions should be taken when
undertaking development in the Himalayas?
In the Himalayas, you need to be extra careful before
undertaking a project. You need to look at the terrain, at the soil condition,
to see whether this is a fragile area or not. This is something which we have
not really paid much attention to. This Uttarkashi tunnel collapse is not the
first time such a disaster has happened. There are several incidents that have
taken place in the recent past.
The other aspect is the Char Dham highway. A highway
means a huge amount of traffic is now traversing these areas. It also means
many more tourists, more guest houses and hotels. On the other side, there is
no proper control over or management of waste. We will find that large amounts
of waste are thrown on the hillside in many of these areas. There’s no control,
no waste management systems and no punishment for violations.
The question to be asked is, do we really
need to make these kinds of highways for pilgrims which are not tourist spots?
The Himalayas are synonymous with pilgrimages but now
they are turning into all-weather tourist spots. They do not have the carrying
capacity for so many people. The Char Dham highway will be followed by a
railway from Rishikesh to Karnaprayag. Another 27 or 28 tunnels will be built
along the way. The whole Alaknanda valley is being completely ruined. Why do
you need a railway in addition to a 4-6 lane highway?
There are several defence-linked developmental
projects taking place in the Himalayas…
It has been argued that the requirements of defence
and national security may require loosening of environmental rules. But if our
border infrastructure is frequently disrupted as a result of frequent
avalanches and landslides, how does that improve defence? Again, my argument is
that good defence demands paying close and careful attention to the
environment. They are not antithetical.
Meanwhile, huge losses are taking place in the wake of
the disasters…
The mistake is
to put the environment versus development, as if there is a trade-off between
them or a contradiction between the two. That you must sacrifice one, in order
to have the other. But that's a false choice.
Look at the amount of money that will be spent for frequent repairs to
bring (projects like dams etc) back on stream after repeated avalanches,
landslides or tunnel collapses.
Today, we are only looking at project cost and claim
that tourism will bring livelihood to the people, but that is a short-term kind
of gain. In the long-term, if the area around the development starts
collapsing, you know people's lives will be affected. That will bring even
greater economic loss. I think we have now reached a stage where preserving the
environment is becoming the condition for sustainable development.
What is the need of the hour?
The point I want to make is that in this very
sensitive and very fragile ecological zone we must be very careful about what
kind of projects we undertake. There are many other areas in the country where
developmental projects can be undertaken, rather than in areas such as these
which are so fragile and where the ecological impact will be far worse in the
future.
Why do you need five-lane roads to pilgrimage sites?
The whole idea of a pilgrimage was to travel to a remote place so that you had
time to commune with yourself. But now you have thousands of people visiting
the Himalayas every day. I think when so many people visit, the place loses its
character as a pilgrimage.
Is climate change a major factor?
Climate change is certainly taking place, but climate change is also exacerbated by what human beings are doing in these ecologically sensitive zones. You cannot blame the collapse of the tunnel in Uttarkashi on climate change. It is fairly well established that there is a feedback loop between large developmental projects and climate change. Moreover, large crowds raise the temperature of a place which, in turn, has its own ecological impact. The factors causing climate change are all linked.